Skip to main content
English League 2 · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Northampton v Swindon Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.1%
Expected goals1.49 – 1.14Northampton / Swindon

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.5%
#21-09.5%
#32-19.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.4%7.0%4.7%1.8%0.5%
19.5%13.5%7.0%2.6%0.8%
28.0%9.1%5.2%2.0%0.6%
34.0%4.5%2.6%1.0%0.3%
41.5%1.7%1.0%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.1%
Model fair odds10.95
Recorded CS odds10.00
Bookmaker implied10.0%
Model-market gap-0.9 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-8.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.73View odds
Both teams to score — No2.00View odds
Over 2.51.91View odds
Under 2.51.83View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Northampton versus Swindon to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy