Skip to main content
English National League · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Worthing v Forest Green Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-29.0%
Expected goals1.34 – 1.58Worthing / Forest Green

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.2%
#21-29.0%
#30-17.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.2%7.8%6.8%3.6%1.4%
16.5%12.2%9.0%4.7%1.9%
24.8%7.6%6.0%3.2%1.3%
32.2%3.4%2.7%1.4%0.6%
40.7%1.1%0.9%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.0%
Model fair odds11.08
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-3.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-27.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.57View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.67View odds
Under 2.52.10View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Worthing versus Forest Green to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy