Skip to main content
Spanish Segunda · Sunday, 16 August 2026

Burgos v Cordoba Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-114.9%
Expected goals1.25 – 1.12Burgos / Cordoba

Most likely scorelines

#11-114.9%
#20-011.2%
#31-010.0%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
011.2%8.7%5.9%2.2%0.6%
110.0%14.9%7.3%2.7%0.8%
27.3%8.2%4.6%1.7%0.5%
33.0%3.4%1.9%0.7%0.2%
41.0%1.1%0.6%0.2%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate14.9%
Model fair odds6.73
Recorded CS odds5.80
Bookmaker implied17.2%
Model-market gap-2.4 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-13.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published15 Aug 2026 · 20:58 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.85View odds
Both teams to score — No1.85View odds
Over 2.52.20View odds
Under 2.51.60View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Burgos versus Cordoba to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 3-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy