Skip to main content
English Championship · Sunday, 16 August 2026

Burnley v West Ham Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-113.2%
Expected goals1.29 – 1.54Burnley / West Ham

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.2%
#21-29.0%
#30-17.7%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
07.4%7.7%7.0%3.6%1.4%
16.2%13.2%9.0%4.6%1.8%
24.9%7.6%5.8%3.0%1.1%
32.1%3.3%2.5%1.3%0.5%
40.7%1.0%0.8%0.4%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate13.2%
Model fair odds7.59
Recorded CS odds6.50
Bookmaker implied15.4%
Model-market gap-2.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-14.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published15 Aug 2026 · 20:58 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.20View odds
Over 2.51.73View odds
Under 2.52.00View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Burnley versus West Ham to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy