Skip to main content
Swedish Allsvenskan · Sunday, 16 August 2026

Djurgarden v AIK Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-17.2%
Expected goals2.17 – 1.06Djurgarden / AIK

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.0%
#22-19.9%
#32-09.4%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.9%3.3%2.2%0.8%0.2%
17.7%10.0%4.8%1.7%0.4%
29.4%9.9%5.2%1.8%0.5%
36.8%7.2%3.8%1.3%0.4%
43.7%3.9%2.1%0.7%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate7.2%
Model fair odds13.98
Recorded CS odds10.00
Bookmaker implied10.0%
Model-market gap-2.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-28.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published15 Aug 2026 · 20:58 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.20View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.50View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Djurgarden versus AIK to finish 3-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-3, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 3-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy