Skip to main content
Danish Super League · Sunday, 16 August 2026

Randers v Copenhagen Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-36.2%
Expected goals1.16 – 1.90Randers / Copenhagen

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.4%
#21-29.8%
#30-28.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.8%7.9%8.5%5.4%2.5%
14.4%11.4%9.8%6.2%2.9%
23.2%6.0%5.7%3.6%1.7%
31.2%2.3%2.2%1.4%0.7%
40.4%0.7%0.6%0.4%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate6.2%
Model fair odds16.11
Recorded CS odds13.00
Bookmaker implied7.7%
Model-market gap-1.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published15 Aug 2026 · 20:58 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-3

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.57View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.57View odds
Under 2.52.25View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Randers versus Copenhagen to finish 1-3. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-4, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-3
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy